The Good Shepherd

posted Saturday, 23 December 2006
The Good Shepherd

Robert DeNiro (director)

  —   DVD / VHS

product page

Rating:

This has to be one of the most timely movie reviews I've ever done, since the film just opened this weekend. It's the sacrifice I make for you--when my friend Elliot suggested going to the movies, I agreed just so I could review the film for all of you.

Before we get to the film, however, let me review the theater at which we saw it: the Cinemark theater in Sandusky, Ohio. Wow, what a crappy theater. Constructed in the days just before stadium seating became all the rage, it was outdated before it was worn out. Now, however, it is worn out as well. The thing it really has going for it is that the only other theater within at least a half hour drive is just as craptacular as it is. Location, location, location....

Okay, on with the show. The story here is two-fold: the growth of the CIA and the personal journey of one of its early (fictional) operatives. Matt Damon plays this central figure, Edward Wilson, a bright, idealistic Yale English major who is brought into the secret world of the Skull and Bones fraternity, from which it is only a short step to spying for the government, first on his Germanic poetry professor and later as part of the WWII Office of Strategic Services (which later becomes the CIA). Wilson is in many ways an idealistic, if flawed, man of principle. His commitment is always to his country. At the same time, in his personal life, he sacrifices the opportunity he seems to have for love with his deaf girlfriend (Tammy Blanchard) in order to do "the right thing" and marry a friend's sister when he gets her pregnant (Angelina Jolie--pretty lousy second prize, huh?). In many ways, it is this alternation between his personal life and his professional life in the CIA that defines the film. The two are constantly intertwined and illuminate one another-to say nothing of shaping one another.

Over the course of the film we see both Wilson and the CIA itself develop from idealistic beginnings to jaded hardness as Wilson comes almost to define the CIA. The story shifts back and forth not only between personal and private but also between the movie's present (just before and after the Bay of Pigs invasion) and Wilson's past--taking us from his college days through WWII and the Cold War. The plot can be a bit much to follow, as it has not only these two axes of work/home and past/present to deal with, but also a fairly complex plot as Wilson works to figure out what went wrong with the Cuban operation.

If it sounds like a juggling act taht DeNiro has for himself as director, that's because it is, and while he keeps all the balls in the air, it's not always with the dexterity we might have liked. The pace sometimes drags and sometimes speeds ahead too fast. With an almost-three-hour film on your hands, you really need the pacing to be almost perfect. Otherwise, when it drags you notice it; maybe the lulls were to give the audience time to process what the heck just happened when the film moved a bit too fast, but in any case it took something away from the film.

Nonetheless, on the whole I thought it was quite good. Without being in the least preachy, it offers an interesting take (or maybe I should say "takes") on national security issues that, of course, are still relevant today. At the same time, we're given a good mystery to puzzle out and interesting characters who we by and large believe in.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. lisapooh left...
Saturday, 23 December 2006 7:44 pm

Sounds like a good movie...I used to work in a theater like the one you described. I worked behind the concession stand selling pop and popcorn.


2. Elliot left...
Sunday, 24 December 2006 9:49 am

John neglected to mention that four of the eight screening rooms were without heat on this particular day. God love Sandusky theatres.


3. catty left...
Sunday, 24 December 2006 3:53 pm :: http://savetheamericanfamily.blog-city.c

Aahhh, Sandusky. That strange midway point between Cleveland and Toledo. I can't say I've been to a theater there but you do have an awesome amusement park. Did they have blankets at the consession stand for the unheated rooms?

I really like the way you review books and movies. We were thinking of seeing this movie. It sounds good. I don't mind an intricate plot you have to pay attention to, it's when I miss hearing something and have to ask for a translation that things get sticky. I might have to wait till it comes to video so I can replay.

Did you see Syriana? I'm still scratching my head over the part where the George Clooney character gets tortured. What did I miss? If you didn't see it, I'm pretty sure I didn't give anything away.


4. Zachary Nowak left...
Sunday, 24 December 2006 6:06 pm

Ohio? Is that near Kansas? Sorry to disagree with you, Sherck, but the lulls seemed to last about two hours and forty minutes. I couldn't decide what of Wilson's early days could have been cut to make for a shorter, tighter movie...maybe just don't go to see the movie. I guess it also got on my nerves because of the whole idea that pretty much the CIA is full of good people, working for world peace, etc., except for the occasional bad apple, carved out sooner or later. The toppling of the Central American president came closest to attempting to rewrite this cliched narrative (perhaps the Arbenz-Armas affair of Guatemala, 1954?) but in the end didn't deliver. Would the Cuban peasant have been better off had the Bay of Pigs succeeded? For personal liberty, maybe: for health care and education, deifnitely not. But this is irrelevant to my take on "The Good Shepherd" : wouldn't recommend it, wouldn't watch it again. Merry Christmas to all!!!!

Actually, my first reaction was less enthusiastic than my review ended up being... it was a case of talking myself into liking it. I suspect that there's a certain honesty in its portrayal, in many ways I saw it as a story of power corrupting... witness the difference between the first head of the agency, insisting on oversight (though we never really saw that materialize) and the guy at the end of the movie seeing the agency as god-like: able to and justified in doing whatever it wants. Maybe I'm projecting here, but I didn't see the portrayal of the Bay of Pigs invasion ultimately as bemoaning what could have been if only so much as showing the overbearing arrogance of the CIA and the U.S. We see it, of course, primarily through the eyes of a believer, and that distorts it somewhat, but I think its message, inasmuch as it has one, is against this arrogance.